Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Putin might make a deal (Score 1) 22

..."Kill 10 Ukrainian soldiers, and you get your game back."

Ukraine is doing something like that... Ukrainian computer game-style drone attack system goes ‘viral'

System rewards soldiers who achieve strikes with points that can be used to buy more weapons in an online store.

The number of Russian casualties in September is double the number from last October, in part because the Kyiv government doubled the rewards for killing Russian infantry from six to 12 points, reflecting changing battlefield priorities. ... killing an enemy drone operator now earns 25 points and using a drone to capture a Russian soldier attracts 120 points

A BBC article, Kill Russian soldiers, win points: Is Ukraine's new drone scheme gamifying war? notes:

... destroying an enemy multiple rocket launch system earns up to 50 points; 40 points are awarded for a destroyed tank and 20 for a damaged one.

Google: Ukraine earn points

Comment Re:Even simpler solution (Score 1) 30

SIM-locking should be banned, period. Works well in many other countries. There is no valid reason to SIM-lock a phone, even for 60 days or 60 days of active paid service. It's a net loss to society as a whole. Even though I understand it can benefit Verizon in one case, it also prevented someone else to switch to Verizon from a competitor.

I think people in other countries generally buy their phones outright, rather than via provider payment plans, often at a discount, like in the U.S. and I think SIM locking is to prevent people from switching providers before those phones are paid off - and so the providers don't have to sue to recoup that money. That's probably reasonable, but doing it to just make it harder for people to switch is not. Of course, most phones smartphones probably aren't paid off after 60 days, unless providers have another avenue to recoup the money for the device, so I don't know how a policy works in that case.

From Cell Phone Unlocking:

Locked phones are often sold at a reduced price or as part of an installment plan. They remain locked until all the installments are paid, or for a certain period of time to ensure the phone is used on the network of the provider that sold the phone at a discount.

Even when paying full price for a cell phone, it may be locked for a short period of time, such as 60 days, to help prevent theft and certain types of fraud. Providers may have different unlocking policies for their prepaid and postpaid monthly service plans.

As for me, I bought my three successive cell phones over the last 26 years. unlocked and in full.

Comment Re:94% of Trump's cases lose in lower courts (Score 1) 132

And 94% of them are overturned in favor of Trump when they get to the Supreme court, usually on the shadow docket with absolutely no reason given. The system of checks and balances designed to protect you have failed. All of them.

The lower courts getting overturned by a higher court is part of that system of checks and balances. Many people think it's the lower courts that are failing.

Many of the lower court decisions seem pretty solid, reasonable and thought-out, but SCOTUS, especially Justices Alito and Thomas, is seemingly just making stuff up, or misinterpreting things from Medieval England, to support their agendas.

Alito's Roe attack betrays a medieval ignorance of ancient history
Google: alito medieval england roe

Many of their rulings that specifically favored Trump seem like stretches, like the near-total immunity for the President and limiting the application of the insurrection clause for presidential candidates. It'll be interesting to see how they re-interpret things when a Democrat is in the office - I'm guessing 3-6 will then see things differently.

Comment led by Letitia James, New York's AG (Score 1) 132

That's gotta really torque Trump off. :-)

"It's more symbolic than substantive," he said. "All the court is saying is ... you need to go back to work and consider these applications. What does that really mean?" he said. Officials could still deny permits or bog applications down in lengthy reviews, he noted.

Sure, but companies only have to wait 3 more years ...

Comment Re:Nope (Score 1) 53

More like "scammer of the year" 2026 will be the year of the AI hangover when reality (and the bill) sets in

Then it's convenient they're all sitting on a girder, from which they can be strung. :-)

Ironic that they chose this image as if their work compares, at least in effort and danger, to the iron workers building skyscrapers in the original b/w photo: Lunch atop a Skyscraper. None of those "AI Architects" would ever have lunch there.

Comment Apples and oranges (Score 1) 156

if you're an internet platform you get treated one way; you do the exact same thing and you're a publisher, you get treated a completely different way.

This is a false comparison. ISPs generally don't (get to) pick their customers and don't select, edit, and curate those customers content, publishers do both. Publishers have a direct hand in who and what gets published and when, ISP generally don't. Granted, ISPs could be (more) selective in who they signup, like publishers, but that would be hugely labor-intensive and not cost effective given the scale of ISP customers vs. publishers. Even then ISP wouldn't (generally) get involved in their customer's content - as that would get them into trouble under Section 230 (if I understand things correctly). All subject to Terms and Conditions, your mileage may vary, etc ...

Comment Re:Dumbing down (Score 1) 116

Republicans are also know-it-alls who claim they're "smarter" than scientists and know "what's best" for everyone with zero evidence and zero experience.

Our current President and his followers especially... Usually the smarter (more educated) someone is the more they realize how much they don't know. Sadly, the opposite is also often true. The dumber (less educated) often they know more than they do. See: Dunning–Kruger effect

Trump thinks he knows everything and is the best at everything, which makes me believe this story about one of his former Wharton professors, as reported here:

“Donald Trump was the dumbest goddam student I ever had.” Dr. Kelley told me this after Trump had become a celebrity but long before he was considered a political figure. Dr. Kelley often referred to Trump’s arrogance when he told of this — that Trump came to Wharton thinking he already knew everything.

Comment Re:China is still way behind (Score 2) 124

Sure, they might have the lead in most things that will effect the future.
But did they maximize shareholder value? I think not
. U-S-A! U-S-A!

Over the next quarter or five-ten years? 'Cause U.S. companies only really seem to care about the former, while the Chinese seem to care more about the latter.

Comment Re:Sensible economic policies work. (Score 2) 124

The US gives the rich tax breaks, the rich hoard their wealth, ...

To be fair, they don't all hoard all of it; some buy really, really expensive yachts - and slightly less expensive backup yachts for those yachts - or media companies, like TikTok and Paramount, a Nth back-up mansion, or donate money to the President for favors, etc...

Slashdot Top Deals

Modeling paged and segmented memories is tricky business. -- P.J. Denning

Working...