Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - Debian 13 trixie arrives with RISC-V support and updated Linux kernel (nerds.xyz)

BrianFagioli writes: After more than two years (wow!) of development, Debian 13 âoetrixieâ has officially been released. The new stable version will receive five years of support from the Debian Security team and the Long Term Support team, continuing the projectâ(TM)s tradition of reliability.

This release includes updated desktop environments such as GNOME 48, KDE Plasma 6.3, LXDE 13, LXQt 2.1.0, and Xfce 4.20. There are over 14,100 new packages, more than 44,000 updated ones, and around 8,800 that have been removed as obsolete. The codebase now spans more than 1.46 billion lines.

Key software updates include the Linux kernel 6.12 LTS, LibreOffice 25.2, GCC 14.2, OpenJDK 21, PostgreSQL 17, PHP 8.4, Python 3.13, LLVM/Clang 19, GIMP 3.0.4, Apache 2.4.64, Nginx 1.26, MariaDB 11.8, and systemd 257.

A major change in this release is the official addition of riscv64 support, making it possible to run Debian on 64-bit RISC-V hardware. Debian 13 supports seven architectures in total. However, this release also ends i386 as a standard architecture and is the last version to support armel.

The Debian team has continued to improve reproducible builds, added 64-bit time_t support for dates beyond 2038, and optimized cloud images for Amazon EC2, Microsoft Azure, OpenStack, and PlainVM. For those who want to try it before installing, live images are available for amd64 and arm64 in multiple desktop environments.

Comment Re:Repeat after me (Score 1) 35

I'm self-hosting Vaultwarden on my LAN, a Bitwarden-compatible backend written in Rust. I have it running inside a jail on TrueNAS Core (which, alas, is now end-of-life). It hosts its own Web interface, but also is compatible with Bitwarden's Android app and browser plugins.

So far, it's worked out pretty well for me.

Comment ...There's a Trending Page? (Score 1) 12

I thought that's what the front page was. It keeps wasting space with things I'm not interested in, or actively dislike.

New Video from The Primagen!
<block channel>

NotAIHonestly Gets Rare Interview with The Primagen!
<block channel>

FrierenFan04 Reacts to !AIH's Interview with Primagen!
<smashes keyboard>

Comment Re:Nobody understand what this is (Score 4, Informative) 21

This is how I've come to understand it. I welcome any and all corrections.

Passkeys are a cryptographic key stored in a Secure Element. This is usually a private key inside a small cryptographic engine. You feed it some plaintext along with the key ID, and it encrypts it using that key. The outer software then decrypts the ciphertext using the public key. If the decrypted text matches the original plaintext, then that proves you're holding a valid private key, and authentication proceeds.

The private key can be written to and erased from the Secure Element, but never read back out. All it can do is perform operations using the secret key to prove that it is indeed holding the correct secret key.

On phones, the Secure Element is in the hardware of your handset. On PCs, this is most often the TPM (Trusted Platform Module) chip. In both cases, the platform will ask for your PC's/phone's password/fingerprint/whatever before forwarding the request to the Secure Element.

Yubikeys can also serve as a Secure Element for Passkeys; the private key is stored in the Yubikey itself. Further, the Yubikey's stored credentials may be further protected with a PIN, so even if someone steals your Yubikey, they'll still need to know the PIN before it will accept and perform authentication checks. You get eight tries with the PIN; after that, it bricks itself.

The latest series 5 Yubikeys can store up to 100 Passkeys, and Passkeys may be individually deleted when no longer needed. Older series 5 Yubikeys can store only 25 Passkeys, and can only be deleted by erasing all of them.

Theoretically, you can have multiple Passkeys for a given account (one for everyday access; others as emergency backups). Not all sites support creating these, however.

Comment Thirty Fucking Years Late (Score 1, Informative) 91

Congratulations, you feckless imbeciles. You've "innovated" general software package management a mere three $(GOD)-damned decades after Redhat and Debian did it.

While you're at it, why don't you "invent" a tiling window manager that can be driven entirely from the keyboard... Oh, wait...

Honestly... Why is anyone still voluntarily giving money to these chowderheads?

Submission + - Nvidia Accused of Media Manipulation Ahead of RTX 5060 Launch

jjslash writes: Hardware Unboxed has raised serious concerns about Nvidia's handling of the upcoming GeForce RTX 5060 launch. In a recent video, the independent tech reviewers allege that Nvidia is using tightly controlled preview programs to manipulate public perception, while actively sidelining critical voices.

The company is favoring a handful of more "friendly" outlets with early access, under strict conditions. These outlets were given preview drivers – but only under guidelines that make their products shine beyond what's real-world testing would conclude. To cite two examples:

  • One of the restrictions is not comparing the new RTX 5060 to the RTX 4060. Don't even need to explain than one.
  • Another restriction or heavy-handed suggestion: run the RTX 5060 with 4x multi-frame generation turned on, inflating FPS results, while older GPUs that dont support MFG look considerably worse in charts.

The result: glowing previews published just days before the official launch, creating a first impression based almost entirely on Nvidia's marketing narrative.

Comment Re:We can't go back. (Score 0) 59

Indeed, when the first SSDs appeared, I cynically observed at the time that the only reason they existed was to make Micros~1's shitty filesystem seem faster than it was. Thus, it was no surprise when Micros~1 started heavily promoting them -- especially those weird "hybrid" drives that bolted an SSD on the side of a traditional hard drive to use as an extended cache.

Comment Rapacious Assholes (Score 4, Informative) 108

A diskless 8-bay Synology DS1821+ NAS will set you back USD$999.99

One. Thousand. Dollars. For 4GiB ECC RAM and no storage.

Contrast with the NAS I built seven years ago around an Intel i3, micro-ATX mobo, 32GiB of ECC RAM, six 4GB Hitachi spindles in a RAIDZ2 vdev, and TrueNAS Core (nee FreeNAS). The 8-bay case isn't quite as sexy as Synology's, but it acquits itself quite well.

It cost me USD$1700.00 at the time. By far, the largest expense was the hard drives and RAM, both of which have significantly fallen in price since then. If I were to build the same specs today, it would be at least $400.00 cheaper.

Even so, it was way cheaper than going with Synology. Now it seems Synology have adopted the HP printer ink business model, except without the tissue-thin "loss leader" justification -- no way is that chassis actually worth a thousand bucks.

Build your own NAS. It ain't hard, it will be more capable, and you'll save money.

Slashdot Top Deals

Real Programmers don't write in PL/I. PL/I is for programmers who can't decide whether to write in COBOL or FORTRAN.

Working...