I think it depends on what you are reading. I shudder at the thought of relying on social media for information. Remember, Reagan and Clinton didn't deregulate the planet's media, merely America's which was mostly bought up by an Australian. Do you think Bezos, Zuckerberg, Musk or even Murdoch have much sway over people.cn or the press in advanced and educated democracies like Ireland, Sweden, or Belgium? Definitely nothing like they do over new media or what passes for journalism in America.
I read "legacy media" and was well aware of the tariffs and recession Trump and Musk had planned. They were quite clear in warning there would be pain.
For that matter, I remember reading interviews with Trump over a decade ago when he was just another racist vanity candidate millionaire with a bus driving across Iowa deadset on not just beating Obama, but establishing an American monarchy.
It was all out there. Just not much of it was covered by the American press. How can you expect it to be? There is some great American journalism, but it's important to seek out and understand opposing views if you want to make any sense of it all. Reading is more than understanding the words, it requires an understanding of context and point of view and the ability to triangulate from this input; something really not possible in the robotic echo chambers in the walled gardens of American social media or Gannett and Murdoch, Inc.
.