Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Expensive? (Score 1) 51

MTV had to pay to run the videos, as I understand it they also had to share ad revenue, and ad revenue was a challenge because audience attention span was measured in 3-5 minute increments rather than in half-hour or hour-long blocks of time. The economics were never favourable for them; the only reason they've hung around this long is because they had the right idea at the right time in the early 1980s with running music videos on cable television, and they pivoted out to reality TV a decade later.

That is not true. They didn't pay for most of the videos, and when they did pay, it was peanuts. https://www.forbes.com/2005/09...

Comment Re:Bought a card with the code already scratched o (Score 2) 62

When you buy a gift card, a diligent purchaser will ensure that the scratch-off part isn't already scratched off.

No mention of any of this is suspicious.

Really, dude... You can buy 1k scratch labels for 10$ on Aliexpress. Just search for something like "scratch off label film".

Comment Re:Shoud be "the Chinese owned, Norway-based compa (Score 1) 43

James Yahui Zhou, the controlling shareholder of Kunlun, is both Chair of Opera's Board and its CEO: "As of the date of this annual report, Kunlun, a Chinese public company listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, indirectly owns 68.8% of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Comment Shoud be "the Chinese owned, Norway-based company" (Score 5, Informative) 43

James Yahui Zhou, the controlling shareholder of Kunlun, is both Chair of Opera's Board and its CEO: "As of the date of this annual report, Kunlun, a Chinese public company listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, indirectly owns 68.8% of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares.

Comment Re:Active Bluetooth transmission 0.7 sq mm? (Score 2) 17

It would have been amazing, but the paywalled article is saying "The devices — MADE WITH microchips 0.7 square millimetres in size — are embedded in shipping labels stuck to the shrink-wrapped bundles of items trucked from warehouses to stores" So no mention of the actual tracking device's size.

Submission + - Brazil piloting dWallet - project that lets citizens earn money from their data (restofworld.org)

applique writes: Last month, Brazil announced it is rolling out a data ownership pilot that will allow its citizens to manage, own, and profit from their digital footprint — the first such nationwide initiative in the world.

The pilot involves a small group of Brazilians who will use data wallets for payroll loans. When users apply for a new loan, the data in the contract will be collected in the data wallets, which companies will be able to bid on. Users will have the option to opt out. It works much like third-party cookies, but instead of simply accepting or declining, people can choose to make money.

The “dWallet” allows users to deposit the data generated by their daily activities into a “data savings account.” After a user accepts a company’s offer on their data, payment is cashed in the data wallet, and can be immediately moved to a bank account.

In the U.S., a 2019 “data dividend” initiative by California Governor Gavin Newsom never took off. The city of Chicago successfully monetizes government data including transportation and education. If implemented, Brazil’s will be the first public-private partnership that allows citizens, rather than companies, to get a share of the global data market, currently valued at $4 billion and expected to grow to over $40 billion by 2034.

Comment Re:fuck off hypocrite (Score 1) 41

oh kinda like how instagram forced engagement with Threads by signing people up, integrating it into the app and continually pestering people to use it even when they have denied and turned off all notificatiosn and prompts for your stupid product?

oh you mean kinda like that?? fuck right off you fucking idiot.

He left Instagram in 2018. Threads launched in 2023.

Comment Re:Arkell v Pressdram (1971) (Score 5, Funny) 141

Wikipedia - In the case of Arkell v. Pressdram (1971), the plaintiff was the subject of an article.[68] Arkell's lawyers wrote a letter which concluded: "His attitude to damages will be governed by the nature of your reply." Private Eye responded: "We acknowledge your letter of 29th April referring to Mr J. Arkell. We note that Mr Arkell's attitude to damages will be governed by the nature of our reply and would therefore be grateful if you would inform us what his attitude to damages would be, were he to learn that the nature of our reply is as follows: fuck off."

Slashdot Top Deals

Never ask two questions in a business letter. The reply will discuss the one you are least interested, and say nothing about the other.

Working...