Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission + - Crop nutrition down 3.2% in under 4 decades due to rising CO2 levels

GameboyRMH writes: It's a well-understood phenomenon that rising CO2 levels decrease crop nutrition, but now Futurism reports that Dutch researchers have tallied the recent damage: in a survey of 43 different crops, nutrients were found to have fallen an average of 3.2% since the late '80s. Higher CO2 levels cause crops to gain biomass faster without absorbing nutrients at an accelerated rate and with decreased water consumption, resulting in lower nutrient concentration. “The plant is becoming more efficient, but it’s occurring at a price, from a human perspective,” Lewis Ziska, a plant biologist at Columbia University who studied the phenomenon for more than two decades, told WaPo. Previous studies have estimated that by 2050, this effect could cause zinc deficiency to affect an additional 175 million people, protein deficiency to affect an additional 122 million, and could decrease iron uptake by 4% while 1.4 billion women of childbearing age and children under 5 already live in countries with anemia rates of over 20%.

Comment Re:I never tire ... (Score 1) 96

The only way a discussion board comment will ever end up in an AI data center is after it's ripped from the Internet for training data. They're nothing like a traditional general-purpose data center, you're making an apples-and-hand grenades comparison between two things that are kinda round, handheld-sized and will hurt if they bonk you on the head. If every AI data center burned to the ground tomorrow, only AI services would be lost, and every discussion board could drop these PITA Cloudflare checks needed to keep the AI scrapers from bogging them down.

Comment "Fairly voice their opinions" (Score 1) 81

"We're confident an unbiased court will overturn the original certification, and we look forward to the opportunity for our team to fairly voice their opinions."

Yes, a fair voicing of "opinions" on labor conditions between one human and one globe-spanning immortal megacorporation. Very fair.

Comment Re:Earn less? (Score 1) 81

and not great for those buying the companies products because those higher costs will be passed on to the customers in higher prices.

Only true for goods and services where there is perfectly inelastic demand, which kind of doesn't exist. Even demand for fuel is somewhat elastic. Health care has about the least elastic demand. Junk from Amazon has highly elastic demand.

But maybe Bezos and the other execs will take a pay cut to come up with more money for the warehouse workers and prices will not increase.

This would certainly happen to a large degree, otherwise Amazon could price themselves out of competitiveness fairly easily.

Comment Re:BitTorrent (Score 1) 61

That would add the requirement for the central repository as infrastructure which is probably not worth it bandwidth/storage-wise when so many gaming PCs are likely to be online at any time, but the possibility of a malware vector (or some kind of sabotage, maybe people would try to DoS a game by sharing corrupted compiled shaders as a form of protest) is worth considering with or without it.

BOINC protects against errors or sabotage in their distributed computing system by having 2 random different users both run the same task and ensuring that the results from both match before accepting the result. This requires centralized infrastructure, but a duplicated work verification system like this could work. Imagine the centralized system acts as a trusted private torrent tracker, only verifying a shader and making it publicly accessible once multiple uploads match. That would make uploading invalid shaders almost impossible since a group would need to conspire to do it with exclusive earliest-possible access to the game/driver/hardware combo.

Slashdot Top Deals

Time to take stock. Go home with some office supplies.

Working...