That may be the case in the US but not in Europe. There we have interop privileges in the EU software copyright directive.
This is why your the steward organisation shall be based in Europe or any other place that grants you legal satefy.

To satisfy US requirements the trick is usually to separate research from implementation.

that is, you have one project that documents functionality, and another independent project that implements the spec.

Adversarial interoperability of course needs to get stengthened.

This really does not matter. Copyright protects only the expession of software. You are free to clone software with independent code.

Let's face it, we now have four products:
- Then we have LibeOffice Online (resurrected)
- Collabora which originaed as a LO online fork.
- OnlyOffice , the Russians stranded in the Baltics
and
- Euro-Office - a fork of onlyoffice

plus from the public sector french La suite includes Cryptpad an no proper office suite
- Open desk is the German alternative at ZenDIS and includes Collabora.

I think Euro-Office will just be fine but the crucial question is how much staff they are able to amass to bring it up to speed.

How does one replace ERP / ERM frameworks? Is is even possible to write your own app with forms and data reports with a modern programming language as Rust?

AI make development more efficient and effective but the classic problem in development is not lack of people but lack of development progress.
If doubt that you can be able to lay off people, you just have to deal with more code to shape and scrutinise.

Take software maintainers as an example. You need more human maintainers to deal with the AI slop of reputation farming, not less.

Sooner or later the AI LLM market will collapse on the financial market but we will continue to need programmers that use AI.

The counter argument would be like C is more easier to code as assembler, so C led to assembler coder layoffs.
And we heard it before, about RAD assisted coding, in fact we only needed more and more developers.

All those poor teachers who will learn about World of Tanks from their pupils' WWII essays.

It is really sad what happened to the product. A prime example of what Cory Doctorow calls enshittification. there needs to be a harder push for open source apps, so we could stop the trend of products thea go down the drain and improve the security of services.

It was a really cool platform for making dating related personality tests and nerd around with other users, and then things happened.

Just curious, do they develop it with ADA?

I wonder why Microsoft does not go 100% open source for windows apps, as to ensure that customers are not exposed to "enshittification" risks of their favourite apps by suboptimal cloud and AI inclusions or product upgrades. These days you cannot be sure that your favourite app will be available in two years time. WIN 11 is already so much worse than Win 10.

Just move the AI data centres to Northern Europe then. Tropical AIland.