Comment Clearly George Santos did not ... (Score 1) 43
pay the orange one a sufficiently large bribe to ensure that he was not charged.
pay the orange one a sufficiently large bribe to ensure that he was not charged.
The intellect of toddlers improves as time passes. Trump's appears to be going in the opposite direction.
Correct. When I am driving my attention should be looking at the car in front, not peering at a display trying to find the menu item to change air-con fan speed. These screens are dangerous, you think that you will find what you want with a quick glance and suddenly realise that you have had your eyes off the road for 10 seconds - which at 70mph is over 200 yards.
I guess that BMW is now struck off the list when I next look for a car to buy; along with Tesla and others which are just computer screens with a vehicle attached.
Declaring a short product lifetime would not be allowed.
this makes no sense. it's an entirely different issue, plus you simply can't force anyone to provide unlimited support.
My point was to stop a vendor saying that the product lifetime is 3 months and thus using this as a get out from having to provide updates over a reasonable period. Quite how long is another debate.
Also: this need not apply to all s/ware and all bugs equally. Some which, for example, can lead to a security failure exploitable from a remote location if more important than a local cosmetic issue. Deciding a classification is a bigger can of worms than it seems at first sight.
and s/ware vendors had to provide patches/... for free. Declaring a short product lifetime would not be allowed. Would we have better quality s/ware, written secure by design ?
To work Linus' Law needs many eyeballs, unfortunately these are not always around. It seems that AI is helping - which is good. I assume/hope that the current deluge will abate once the current/historic CVEs get fixed and that the only new ones are for bugs in new code.
Because scientists follow the evidence to draw conclusions, they sometimes say things that contradict the ideology. Climate change is a good example of this.
yet people still claim (and some maybe even believe) that climate change is a hoax. Do something before it is too late. I used to think that it would affect my grandkids, not me (I am 71), but I am now not so sure - this Summer has been hot!
The user does not have any opportunity to negotiate a change to any of the clauses, they are 'terms of business', deliberately written so that most people do not read them and even fewer understand them. Amazon is not really any worse than most of the on-line retailers.
What is needed are a set of agreements that are drawn up to be understandable to non lawyers and to be fair to both parties. There need to be a set of them as the requirements of a business selling clothes is different from one selling pizzas. The agreement must be easily checkable by the user that it has not been modified and there should be a short schedule that the business can specify defined terms, eg: business name, delivery charge and timescale, return address,
For those who have not heard of the blueprint for Trump's presidency see Project 2025
Trump is cutting the NOAA budget -- the organisation that it important as it monitors the weather. The orange despot does not like those who produce facts that contradict his lies.
None of the managers or responsible officials live near by so the stench, pollution and health issues are not as important as cutting costs to increase profits and so get that end of year bonus.
There's nothing worse for your business than extra Santa Clauses smoking in the men's room. -- W. Bossert