Comment Simple but provocative (Score 1) 188
The low hanging fruit has been found. I know that sounds simplistic, but the big stuff which was predicted/suggested 50+ years ago is now being corroborated/refuted. Whether gavitational waves or the Higgs boson, it took how many decades for us to fully develop the idea and then come up with a way to test for it? One of the big things being looked at now is neutrinos. How long has it taken from the time they were conceived for us to design ways to find them let alone study them?
There will always be conspiracy wackos and while the internet has only given them a much far-reaching platform to spread their mental gymnastics than they would have in the past, the scientific realm is now focusing on smaller targets which don't readily lend themselves to ease of description let alone testing. The example given of merging general relativity with quantum mechanics ie one such area. How do you come up with a coherent theory which ties together the large and small? If it were easy it would be done by now. Yet how many decades has this been looked at?
At this point, short of finding a dimension or inventing time travel, we won't see large announcements of astounding findings from the physics realm in the near future. It simply takes a long time for everything to work its way through the rigorous scientific process. What we will see are the incremental findings and discoveries which may lead to larger, newsworthy stories a few decades from now.