Comment Re:MLB should stop placating the umpires union (Score 1) 22
This is maybe an acknowledgement for the TV viewing audience who have been able to see the broadcaster computer calls for balls and strikes for many years. So, it was easy to see if an umpire was way off in his call.
They actually don't. When they first starting putting the rectangle graphic on broadcasts, then announcers constantly reminded the audience it was just to give them a general idea of the strike zone, and wasn't an absolute (even as recent as this season, it's just a box from the broadcast truck, and if the annoucers really want to analyze the call, they will show an over-the-plate camera, and utilize slow motion. There's no computer)
The problem is, people began to get real tired of the announcers giving that disclaimer constantly (Joe Buck was the worst. He would drone on about it for every questionable call), so they stopped giving it altogether. They figured the home viewer had received the message. But now there's this belief (especially among younger fans) that the rectangle is a computer calibrated strike zone indicator certified by the OWM, and that all empirical evidence as a result is law. But it's just a superimposed box. The parameters of the strike zone alter with every batter (as their knees are in different places), notice how the box doesn't change at all?