Comment Re:Like the Old Saying Goes . . . (Score -1) 38
Or the victim. You're literally training your replacement.
Or the victim. You're literally training your replacement.
I'll wait for peer review, if that even applies to this "proof."
Spin this, CCPBots.
Define "run."
It's definitely what they're saying. A decade ago, China's first lunar lander was literally a perfect copy of the Apollo lander, down to the rivets. Different logo, though.
Putting him in the "white nationalist in the fascist tribe" sure doesn't put you in any sane one.
LOL. How closely?
Speaking of tribalism...
It's on GitHub.
LLMs are not really designed to learn on the fly. They essentially trust all their sources equally since they just absorb all information they're fed.
That's something newer AIs are trying to solve by letting them experience the real world and develop their own concept of trust and decide which sources are trustworthy based on lived experiences. Just like human children do.
Is there likely to be a 10x increase in factories? Or even twice as many?
Does demand increase magically in your world?
They are the main source of employment for factory workers. Unless you want to claim each factory is now employing thousands of additional engineers, this is certainly a gross reduction in overall human employment.
Lights out in the factory. It's safe to say everything significant is automated.
Like SLS?
You're right, we should end all government "subsidies," meaning all contracts, no matter how cheap or efficiently executed.
Anyway, last time I checked, Musk was very much against extreme waste and graft. He never once criticized government spending in general. SpaceX, in particular, is the cheapest and most efficient of all options, by a vast margin.
Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.